Horowitz v. Kaplan’s Empirical Analysis
193 F.2d 64 · 1951
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2003
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 501
Relies on Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. · Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd · Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du Bois · Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Denver & Rgwr Co Same
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he debtor, the indenture trustees, and any creditor or stockholder of the debtor shall have the right to be heard on all matters arising in a proceeding under this chapter.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“determination of the district court as to the fairness of the plan will not be set aside unless clearly shown to be erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.