Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 F.2d 706 - Machado v. McGrath

Machado v. McGrath’s Empirical Analysis

193 F.2d 706 · 1951

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 1989
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1989 · most notably Ceballos v. Shaughnessy (1957), Sidebotham v. Robison (1954)

29 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2601951196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 50 U.S.C. App. § 301 · 50 U.S.C. App. § 303 · 5 U.S.C. § 1001

Relies on Johnson v. United States · McGrath v. Kristensen · Moser v. United States · Savorgnan v. United States · Mackenzie v. Hare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`opportunity to make an intelligent election' between being subject to the draft on the one hand, and being exempt but losing the right to become a citizen on the other.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In his brief, appellant does not argue that his request for withdrawal of DSS Form 301 should operate to cancel the disability he incurred by filing it. Nor does the complaint allege that Machado followed the correct procedure in requesting withdrawal of the form. Local Board Memorandum No. 112, in effect throughout the period involved herein, provided that requests for induction by aliens who had filed DSS Form 301 should be made in an Application for Voluntary Induction (Form 165). Draft boards were in strueted not to surrender DSS Form 301. They were advised that the effect to be given Form 301 when followed by Form 165 was a matter to be determined by the courts. A notation to this effect was to be typed on the face of each Form 165 prior to the applicant’s signature. Local Board Memo No. 112, as amended Dec. 20, 1943, Part V, pg. 3.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Appellant argues, however, that regulations which, in his case, make a mere temporary visitor of four months a resident cannot be valid. We disagree. The regulations do not • arbitrarily state that anyone who remains here longer than three months shall be deemed a resident regardless of the purpose, duration or circumstances of his presence. They merely require that one who comes to this country in time of war must act within three months to have his status as a resident determined. If the required application is filed, the alien will have his case judged by the applicable administrative and judicial standards.” Machado v. McGrath, 1951, 90 U.S. App.D.C. 70 , 193 F.2d 706 , 708. certiorari denied 342 U.S. 948 , 72 S.Ct. 557 , 96 L.Ed. 705 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.