Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 F.2d 77 - Dad's Root Beer Co. v. Doc's Beverages, Inc.

Dad's Root Beer Co. v. Doc's Beverages, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

193 F.2d 77 · 1951

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2013 · most notably Steele v. Bulova Watch Co. (1952), Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc. (1956)

31 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

3801951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1069 (§ 19 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1116 (§ 34 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (§ 35 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1121 (§ 39 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1126 (§ 44 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1127 (§ 45 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co. · Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Sanders · Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company v. Wolf Brothers & Company · S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any goods or services * * * a false designation of origin, or any false description or representation,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The intent of this Act is to regulate commerce within the control of Congress * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to protect persons engaged in such commerce against unfair competition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.