Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 F.2d 806 - Delany v. Padgett

Delany v. Padgett’s Empirical Analysis

193 F.2d 806 · 1952

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 1976
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1976

6 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

90195219601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ricks v. Grubbs · Heard v. State · McKee v. E. R. Stewar · West Production Co. v. Kahanek · Satterwhite v. Rosser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““These same authorities do, though, make it perfectly clear that the claim of right referred to in the statutes means a bold and open, a downright and persistent claim asserted not furtively by stealth and artifice, but openly, notoriously, unequivocally, adversely and continuously. Because this is so, the decisions under these statutes take pains to leave in no doubt that if there is any break or chink in the armor of proof which a possessor must put and keep on when he undertakes to acquire a title by limitation, such as a single lisp of acknowledgement, the slightest uncertainty or equivocation in the openness and downrightness of his claim, a failure to comply precisely and exactly with the statutory provision, it is, and will be, fatal to the claim.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.