Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 F.2d 848 - United States v. Leviton

United States v. Leviton’s Empirical Analysis

193 F.2d 848 · 1951

Citation profile

118
cited by 118 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

95 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 118 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably Jackson v. Denno (1964), Delli Paoli v. United States (1957)

95 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

6801951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287

Relies on McNabb v. United States · Krulewitch v. United States · Haley v. Ohio · United States v. Mitchell · Upshaw v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) Statement by the Commissioner. The commissioner shall inform the defendant of the complaint against him, of his right to retain counsel and of his right to have a preliminary examination. He shall also inform the defendant that he is not required to make a statement and that any statement made by him may be used against him. The commissioner shall allow the defendant reasonable time and opportunity to consult counsel and shall admit the defendant to bail as provided in these rules.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “« * * * jjad he been silent and unco-operative, the result might well have been different; but we cannot hold the court in error in concluding that the delay occasioned by his own readiness to confess and voluntary assistance to the investigating authorities was reasonable under Rule 5(a), F.R.Cr.P.” United States v. Leviton, 193 F.2d 848, at p. 855 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'Trial by newspaper may be unfortunate, but it is not new and, unless the court accepts the standard judicial hypothesis that cautioning instructions are effective, criminal trials in the large metropolitan centers may well prove impossible.' United States v. Leviton, 2 Cir., 193 F.2d 848, at 857 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.