193 F.2d 875 - Stack v. United States — 193 F.2d 875

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1982

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Ben Margolis, A. L. Wirin, Daniel G. Marshall, Leo Branton, Jr. and Alexander H. Schullman, all of Los Angeles, Cal., Norman Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., and Leo A. Sullivan, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.

¶2Walter S. Binns, Acting U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and MATHEWS, STEPHENS, HEALY, BONE, ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The order denying the motion of appellants to reduce the bail of $50,000.00 is reversed. The case is remanded and the district court ordered to enter orders as follows :

¶6For each of the appealing defendants

Loretta Starvus Stack

William Schneiderman

Albert Jason Lima

Carl Rude Lambert

Oleta O’Connor Yates

Henry Steinberg

Mary Bernadette Doyle

¶7an order that he or she be released from confinement upon the posting of bail in the sum of $10,000.00 cash or bond conditioned as required by law, to be approved by the District Court for the Southern District of California and filed with the Clerk of that court.

¶8For each of the following appealing defendants

Al Richmond

Philip Marshall Connelly

Dorothy Rosenblum Healey

Rose Chernin Kusnitz

Ernest Otto Fox

¶9an order that he or she be released from confinement upon the posting of bail in the sum of $5,000.00 cash or bond conditioned as required by law, to be approved by the district court for the Southern District of California and filed with the Clerk of that court.

WILLIAM DENMAN Chief Judge

ALBERT LEE STEPHENS Circuit Judge

WILLIAM HEALY Circuit Judge

WALTER L. POPE Circuit Judge

¶10BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges

¶11(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

¶12We concur in the order of this court reversing the order of the District Court denying the motion to' reduce bail theretofore fixed in the sum of $50,000.

¶13We dissent from the order of this court fixing bail of certain of the appealing defendants at $10,000 and of other appealing defendants in the sum of $5,000, for the reason that we deem, said amounts to be inadequate.

HOMER T. BONE WM. E. ORR United States Circuit Judges.

¶14MATHEWS, Circuit Judge

¶15(dissenting).

¶16On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, United States v. Schneiderman, D.C.S.D.Cal., 102 F.Supp. 52, the District Court’s order should be affirmed.