Robert McKnight Pardee’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably In Re Christopher Banks (2002), Kurt Carl Kielisch (2001)
5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruning v. United States · In re Szostek · Republic Supply Co. v. Shoaf · Lawrence Tractor Co. v. Gregory · Andersen v. UNIPAC-NEBHELP
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a creditor fails to timely object to a plan or appeal a confirmation order, `it cannot later complain about a certain provision contained in a confirmed plan, even if such a provision is inconsistent with the Code.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“confirmation orders are final orders that are given preclusive effect. Regardless of whether the plan should have been confirmed with the discharge provision, the BAP was correct in holding that, “the Plan is res judicata as to all issues that could have or should have been litigated at the confirmation hearing.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Great Lakes Education shall be paid through the Plan and Great Lakes Higher Education shall receive the total amount of $26,235.00 for its claim and any remaining unpaid amounts, if any, including any claims for interest, shall be discharged by the Plan.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.