Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 F.3d 130 - Dangler v. New York City Off Track Betting Corp.

Dangler v. New York City Off Track Betting Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

193 F.3d 130 · 1999

Citation profile

138
cited by 138 later decisions
2
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Mandell v. County of Suffolk (2003), 151 F. Supp. 2d 371 - Rieger ex rel. Walters v. Drabinsky (2001)

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

12301999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Anderson v. Creighton · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accept all of the plaintiff's factual allegations in the complaint as true and draw inferences from those allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unless it appears beyond doubt that [the students] can prove no set of facts in support of [their] claim which would entitle [them] to relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In ruling on [a motion to dismiss], the court is to look only to the allegations of the complaint and any documents attached to or incorporated by reference in the complaint.”); Leonard F. v. Israel Disc. Bank of New York, 199 F.3d 99, 107 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting Allen v. WestPoint-Pepperell, Inc., 945 F.2d 40, 44 (2d Cir.1991)); Kramer v. Time Warner, Inc., 937 F.2d 767, 773 (2d Cir.1991). 28 . GPI and Weatherford Mem. 10 (citing Alesayi Beverage Corp. v. Canada Dry Corp., 947 F.Supp. 658, 667 (S.D.N.Y.1996), aff'd, 122 F.3d 1055 , 1997 WL 539768 (2d Cir.1997) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.