¶1 Marion Leon Bea appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motions to file an amended complaint in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action that was already closed, which the district court construed as motions for reconsideration of the dismissal of the § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bea v. Arthur, No. 1:04-cv-00802-TSE (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 9, 2006 & entered Jan. *195 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.