193 F. Supp. 2d 774 - Weinstein v. Appelbaum’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited · Weinberger v. UOP, Inc. · Armstrong v. McAlpin · United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“predictions of an IPO and fabulous riches failed to materialize,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.