Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Ga. App. 208 - Smith v. State

193 Ga. App. 208 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sabel v. State · Ladson v. State · Harvey v. State · 146 Ga. App. 370 - Coaxum v. State · 157 Ga. App. 275 - Lambert v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There having been no additional, gratuitous violence employed against the victim, it follows that the evidentiary basis for the aggravated assault [with a deadly weapon] conviction was “used up” in proving the [aggravated assault with the intent to rob]. The entry of separate convictions for both offenses is thus barred by OCGA § 16-1-7 (a). . . . 12”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there are . . . three [separate] prior felonies which cannot be considered to have been `consolidated for trial' under OCGA § 17-10-7 (c).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In all cases, the party making an application for a continuance must show that he has used due diligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.