193 Ill. 2d 433 - Neade v. Portes’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 106 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 206 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Beahringer v. Page (2003), 332 Ill. App. 3d 300 - Prime Leasing, Inc. v. Kendig (2002)
19 federal appellate · 106 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320 (§ 1120 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Pegram v. Herdrich · 111 Ill. 2d 229 - Purtill v. Hess · 174 Ill. 2d 482 - Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd. · 51 Cal. 3d 120 - Moore v. Regents of University of California · 163 Ill. 2d 33 - Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 206 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To sustain an action for medical negligence, plaintiff must show: (1) the standard of care in the medical community by which the physician's treatment was measured; (2) that the physician deviated from the standard of care; and (3) that a resulting injury was proximately caused by the deviation from the standard of care.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it must be alleged that a fiduciary duty exists, that the fiduciary duty was breached, and that such breach proximately caused the injury of which the plaintiff complains.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We decline to recognize a new cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty against a physician for the physician's failure to disclose [financial] incentives * * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.