Weisberg v. Pickens’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1994
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 78 Ill. App. 3d 575 - Intini v. Schwartz · Hutson v. Wood · 25 Ill. App. 3d 100 - Anderson v. City of Wheaton · 57 Ill. App. 2d 362 - Roherty v. Green · Miller v. Pence
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where any party or his or her attorney fears that he or she will not receive a fair trial in the court in which the action is pending, because *** the judge is prejudiced against him or her ***. In any such situation the venue shall not be changed except upon application, as provided herein ***. * * * (c) Every application for a change of venue by a party or his or her attorney shall be by petition *** and *** shall not be granted unless it is presented before trial or hearing begins and before the judge to whom it is presented has ruled on any substantial issue in the case ***. * * * (e) The application may be made to the court in which the case is pending, reasonable notice thereof having been given to the adverse party or his or her attorney.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.