Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Kan. 111 - Willmeth v. Harris

Willmeth v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1965
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Connell v. State Highway Commission · Kleppe v. Prawl · Wendler v. City of Great Bend · Steele v. Rapp · Drenning v. Board of Commissioners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Shall the following be adopted? Shall Jewell County, Kansas, levy a tax of not to exceed two (2) mills on the dollar for any one year, for the purchase of a site or sites, and the erection thereon of a Long Term Care and Convalescent County Hospital, and for the support of the same, in the City of Mankato, Jewell County, Kansas, at a cost of not to exceed $440,000.00, under the authority of Sections 19-1801 et seq. of the 1961 Supplement to the General Statutes of Kansas for 1949, $220,000.00 of said amount to be obtained through a grant from a federal agency and-or donations from persons, firms, organizations, corporations or societies? “To vote in favor of the levy, make a cross ‘x’ mark in the square after the words ‘fob the levy.’ “To vote against the levy, make a cross ‘X’ mark in the square after the words ‘against the levy.’ “fob the levy □ “against the levy □””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.