Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 La. 520 - Cotton v. Wright

Cotton v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
9
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently October 2007 · most notably 352 So. 2d 1013 - Halcomb v. Halcomb (1977), Thornton v. Floyd (1956)

104 state decisions

27019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Snow v. Snow · Wright v. Wright · State ex rel. Huber v. King · Baker v. Jewell · Edwards v. Perrault

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Counsel’s theory seems to be that, in as much as plaintiff’s suit for separation was dismissed after defendant was granted a divorce on the ground of two years’ separation, there is no suit pending as an incident of which alimony pendente lite may be awarded. It is true, as he argued, that a decree for alimony pendente lite is an incident of a suit for separation or for divorce. But plaintiff by this proceeding is, not seeking to have the court award her alimony. She- is seeking to collect past-due installments of alimony awarded in March, 1937, as an incident to her suit for separation which was then pending, the judgment awarding the alimony and fixing the amount of the weekly installments to be paid having become final prior to the date on which she instituted the present proceeding.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.