Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Md. 596 - Hunter v. State

Hunter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 1992 · most notably State v. Frazier (1984), Bryant v. State (1991)

40 state decisions

150194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. United States · Nelson v. Seiler · Commonwealth v. Quaranta · Berger v. State · Campbell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no question that the granting or refusal of a motion for a continuance or for fixing the date for a trial rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, and will not be disturbed except for arbitrary action or clear abuse of judicial discretion.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.