193 Md. App. 446 - Arthur v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brinegar v. United States · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Resisting Arrest (Warrantless) The defendant is charged with the crime of resisting arrest. In order to convict the defendant of resisting arrest, the State must prove: (1) that a law enforcement officer attempted to arrest the defendant; (2) that the defendant knew that a law enforcement officer was attempting to arrest [him] [her]; (3) that the officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant [was committing] [had committed] (crime); and (4) that the defendant refused to submit to the arrest and resisted the arrest by force.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Arthur v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.