Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Md. App. 45 - Lee v. State

193 Md. App. 45 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wilhelm v. State · State v. Evans · Johnson v. State · Degren v. State · Merzbacher v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “permissible scope of closing argument is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court. The exercise of that discretion will not constitute reversible error unless clearly abused and prejudicial to the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.