Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Md. App. 469 - Parker v. State

193 Md. App. 469 - Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · Alabama v. Smith · New Jersey v. New York · Bozza v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). SENTENCE FOR MURDER VACATED; CASE REMANDED TO THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY FOR RESENTENCING CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION. COSTS TO BE PAID BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE. 1 The motions court judge did not identify the basis on which she found the original sentence illegal. In announcing her decision, the court stated:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that the General Assembly intended for a defendant to receive credit for the time served on a previous sentence that is later vacated”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.