Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Minn. 569 - Fredhom v. Smith

Fredhom v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 1959
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 1959

10 state decisions

50193519401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stenshoel v. Great Northern Railway Co. · Johnston v. Selfe · Libaire v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad · Patterson v. Blatti · Martin v. Tracy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * the nature and extent of the business in question may be considered, and the services of the plaintiff therein, in order to ascertain the value of such lost services, for the value of such personal services are properly considered in this connection.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.