Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Neb. 76 - Bartlett v. Bartlett

Bartlett v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2002 · most notably Ensrud v. Ensrud (1988), Vogel v. Vogel (2002)

41 state decisions

1301975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fisher v. Fisher · Broadstone v. Broadstone · Benson v. Benson · Warren v. Warren · Adamson v. Adamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[w]hen the best interests of the children, in regard to custody, is not clear, the court may, and should, place custody in the court.... “It is evident that when a court finds it necessary to place custody of minor children in the court, it does so because it is doubtful that it is cognizant of the full story relating to the best interests of the children and of the propriety of awarding custody to one of the parties. Such an order is ordinarily temporary and probationary in nature and reserves in the court the power to make further summary disposition of minor children when it becomes apparent that their best interests require it. There has not been a final determination of fitness in regard to either party. That question remains open and subject to determination after further notice and hearing.””
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.