Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 N.J. 38 - Basil v. Wolf

Basil v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 district · 25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · DiProspero v. Penn · Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · Smith v. Director, Division of Taxation · State v. Maguire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “represents the bargain that was struck between employers and employees concerning workplace injuries, whereby employers shoulder the expense of workers' injuries arising out of the performance of work duties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “State regulations now clearly require practicing physicians maintaining a professional office ... to obtain a minimum amount of medical malpractice insurance as a condition for licensure. An IME contract physician who lacked malpractice insurance after ... (the effective date of [N.J.A.C. 13:35 — 6.18(a)]), is unqualified to practice medicine. Consistent with our 2006 holding in Puckrein, supra, an insurance company that engages an IME physician for evaluative purposes now must be aware that it is under a continuing duty of inquiry in respect of malpractice insurance requirements in order to ensure that the physicians it engages are qualified to practice. [Ibid, (internal citation omitted).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A]pparent authority imposes liability on the principal `not as the result of the reality of a contractual relationship but rather because of the actions of a principal or an employer in somehow misleading the public into believing that the relationship or the authority exists.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.