Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 N.Y. 397 - De Wolf v. . Ford

De Wolf v. . Ford’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
16
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably 11 Utah 2d 289 - Samms v. Eccles (1961), Sheely v. MRI Radiology Network, P.A. (2007)

31 federal appellate · 58 state decisions — followed in 16 states

220190819101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedde Wolf v. Ford

Relationships

Relies on Gillespie v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co. · Palmeri v. Manhattan Railway Co. · Rahmel v. Lehndorff · Hulett v. . Swift · Craven v. . Bloomingdale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he business of an innkeeper is of a quasi public character, invested with many privileges, and burdened with correspondingly great responsibilities .... The innkeeper holds himself out as able and willing to entertain guests for hire .... One of the things which a guest for hire at a public inn has the right to insist upon is respectful and decent treatment at the hands of the innkeeper and his servants. That is an essential part of the contract whether it is express or implied. This right of the guest necessarily implies an obligation on the part of the innkeeper that neither he nor his servants will abuse or insult the guest, or indulge in any conduct or speech that may unnecessarily bring upon him physical discomfort or distress of mind.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““There may doubtless be many conditions under which a guest at an inn may be assaulted or insulted by another guest or by an outsider without subjecting the innkeeper to liability, but if it ever was thought to be the law that an innkeeper and his servants have the right to willfully assault, abuse or maltreat a :guest, we think the time has arrived when it may very properly and safely be changed to accord with a more .modern conception of the relation of innkeeper and guest.” (p. 406.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.