Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 OHIOAPP3D 260 - State v. Gaines

State v. Gaines’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

40 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Russell · 119 Ohio St. 3d 375 - State v. Brady · United States v. Mosley · United States v. Cuervelo · 153 Ohio App. 3d 95 - Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Joseph Chevrolet Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can only raise matters that are capable of determination without a trial on the general issue. The Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure do not provide for the equivalent of a civil motion for summary judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “addressed the very issue to be determined at trial and required a determination of the general (and ultimate) issue for trial, to wit, whether the Gaines' alleged acts constituted extortion under Ohio law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[p]rior to trial, any party may raise by motion any defense, objection, evidentiary issue, or request that is capable of determination without the trial of the general issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.