State v. Gaines’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
40 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Russell · 119 Ohio St. 3d 375 - State v. Brady · United States v. Mosley · United States v. Cuervelo · 153 Ohio App. 3d 95 - Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Joseph Chevrolet Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can only raise matters that are capable of determination without a trial on the general issue. The Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure do not provide for the equivalent of a civil motion for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Owens“addressed the very issue to be determined at trial and required a determination of the general (and ultimate) issue for trial, to wit, whether the Gaines' alleged acts constituted extortion under Ohio law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[p]rior to trial, any party may raise by motion any defense, objection, evidentiary issue, or request that is capable of determination without the trial of the general issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Owens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.