Henry v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · State v. Wilson · 81 Ohio App. 3d 591 - Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc. · 7 Ohio App. 3d 93 - Jenkins v. Clark · Roberts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, (2) avoid needless consumption of time, and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bartells v. Bertel“trial judge is something more than a mere umpire or sergeant at arms to preserve order in the courtroom. He has active duties to perform in maintaining justice and in seeing that the truth is developed[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bartells v. Bertel“It is well established that even though a party defaults and admits the allegations of the complaint or stipulates to liability, a plaintiff must still prove his or her damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Whittle v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.