Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 OHIOAPP3D 51 - Meyer v. Chieffo

Meyer v. Chieffo’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · Texas v. United States · Grava v. Parkman Township · Nolan v. Nolan · Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine of unjust enrichment 'applies when a benefit is conferred and it would be inequitable to permit the benefitting party to retain the benefit without compensating the conferring party.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'(1) the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant, (2) the defendant knew of the benefit, and (3) it would be unjust to permit the defendant to retain the benefit without payment.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Claim preclusion * * * 'provides that a valid, final judgment rendered on the merits after a fair and full opportunity to litigate all claims bars all subsequent actions between the same parties or their privies arising out of the transaction or occurrence that gave rise to the prior action.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.