193 So. 2d 618 - Barton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

cited by 28 later decisions

states following

March 1995

most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 1995 · most notably 438 So. 2d 380 - Lightbourne v. State (1983), 397 So. 2d 648 - Palmes v. State (1981)

26 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Linkletter v. Walker · 104 So. 2d 352 - Larry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“The allegations of the indictment were sufficient to charge murder in the first degree, regardless of whether the murder was committed in the perpetration of any of the felonies mentioned in F.S.A. § 782.04 or was committed with a premeditated design. Southworth v. State, 98 Fla. 1184 , 125 So. 345 . Under such a charge evidence under either theory may be introduced and defendant may be convicted either on the theory that the killing was carried out as a result of a premeditated design to effect death or on the theory of felony murder. Larry v. State, 104 So.2d 352 (Fla. 1958).”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Hargrett v. State · Gwong v. State
““The deliberate destruction, concealment, or suppression of material evidence by the State would impair the constitutional rights of an accused. The record is completely void of any such illegal activity on the part of the State, and a bald statement that ‘material evidence has, in fact, been suppressed’ without supporting facts is insufficient.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 230 So. 2d 177 - Brown v. State
“Such proceedings partake of the nature of an inquiry and serve only to determine whether or not probable cause exists to hold a person for trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 204 So. 2d 158 - McLelland v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.