¶1We affirm the order denying the defendant’s motion for re-sentencing following Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). But see Howard v. State, 180 So.3d 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (Altenbemd, J., concurring); Atwell v. State, 128 So.3d 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), review granted 160 So.3d 892 (Fla.2014).
193 So. 3d 48
Enriquez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 27, 2016
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2016-04-27
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2018
5 state decisions
Relies on Miller v. Alabama · 160 So. 3d 869 - In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES—REPORT NO. 13-01 (PRODUCTS LIABILITY) · Poploff v. Florida Department of Financial Services
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2016-04-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →