State v. Hanlen’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably 35 Wash. 2d 1 - Gruen v. State Tax Commission (1949), 108 Wash. 2d 662 - State v. Hodgson (1987)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shea v. Olson · McNulty v. People of State of California · People v. McNulty · State v. Hennessy · Chas. Uhden, Inc. v. Greenough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the]... savings clause is deemed a part of every repealing statute as if expressly inserted therein, and hence renders unnecessary the incorporation of an individual saving clause in each statute which amends or repeals an existing penal statute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““It is presumed that the statute in question is constitutional and the burden rests upon appellant [the attacking party] to establish clearly its invalidity.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““No bill shall embrace more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.