Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Wis. 2d 69 - State v. Kiper

193 Wis. 2d 69 - State v. Kiper’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably United States of America v. Darren Eugene Henderson (2000), 224 Wis. 2d 201 - State v. Secrist (1999)

44 state decisions

260199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Brinegar v. United States · Payton v. New York · Texas v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Searches and seizures. Section 11. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “probable cause eschews technicality and legalisms in favor of a flexible, common-sense measure of the plausibility of particular conclusions about human behavior.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) Whoever knowingly resists or obstructs an officer while such officer is doing any act in an official capacity and with lawful authority, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. (2) In this section: (a) "Obstructs" includes without limitation knowingly giving false information to the officer....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.