193 W. Va. 274 - Rowe v. Grapevine Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2013
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb · Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp. · James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Griffin and Brand of McAllen Inc. · Purtell v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. · Raney v. Barnes Lumber Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Charles 0. and Dorothy Leavitt have been acting only as shareholders of Del Orchard, Inc. in the hiring and procuring of foreign agricultural workers through Grapevine Corporation, Inc., or its predecessor, Tri-County Growers, during the period of time in which the Plaintiffs claim that they have violated the West Virginia Wage Payment and Collection Act, and contracts entered into between Grapevine Corporation and the Plaintiff with reference to three-quarters (%) guarantee and other claims. It is hereby ORDERED that Charles and Dorothy Leavitt’s liability to any Plaintiffs which may accrue, if any, is limited solely to the amount of any subscribed shares of Del Orchard, Inc., which they have not paid for, as provided for [by] Art. 11[XI], § 2 of the West Virginia Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The West Virginia Wage Payment and Collection Act, W.Va.Code 21-5-1 [1987], et seq. is applicable to any firm that suffers or permits a person to work; therefore, when foreign agricultural workers are recruited by'a corporation whose only-activity is the hiring, transporting, feeding, housing and payment of workers who perform all their services for individual growers, the individual growers are joint employers of the workers for the purposes of the West Virginia Wage Payment and Collection Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“compensation for labor or services rendered” or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.