Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 WVA 315 - State v. Mullins

State v. Mullins’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nye & Nissen v. United States · United States v. Peoni · 161 W. Va. 517 - State v. Starkey · 182 W. Va. 345 - State v. Fortner · 191 W. Va. 87 - State v. Jenkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A person who is the absolute perpetrator of a crime is a principal in the first degree, and. a person who is present, aiding and abetting the fact to be done, is a principal in the second degree.” Syllabus point 5, State v. Fortner, 182 W.Va. 345 , 387 S.E.2d 812 (1989).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.