Sunter v. Fraser’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1951
2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad Commission · Fragley v. Phelan · Byrne v. Drain · Clouse v. City of San Diego · 62 Tex. Civ. App. 283 - United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Crittenden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appellants point out that section 961 is a part of article 9, which covers the subject of official bonds to be given by state, county and township officers only (Rowe v. Rose, 26 Cal.App. 744, 745 [ 148 P. 535 ]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fernelius v. Pierce
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.