State v. Braswell’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 84 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently April 2001 · most notably State v. Pinnock (1992), Johnson v. Manson (1985)
3 federal appellate · 84 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · United States v. Mauro · Bowsher v. Merck & Co. · Cuyler v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Given the IAD's use of the word "sent" in subsection (b), we must presume that its use of the word "delivered" in subsection (a) signifies its recognition of the different meanings commonly attributed to each word. It follows that had the IAD intended the 180 day disposition period to commence when the prisoner places his or her request with the custodial officials, subsection (a), like subsection (b), would refer to the date on which the prisoner causes the request to be sent, rather than the date on which it was caused to be delivered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The plain language of Article III, as well as the fair and reasonable construction thereof. . . leads to the conclusion that the date of receipt of notice by the prosecuting authorities triggers the statutory period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in subsection (b), we must presume that its use of the word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.