Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 F.2d 263 - Milan v. Kausch

Milan v. Kausch’s Empirical Analysis

194 F.2d 263 · 1952

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
April 2003
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2003

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

50195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. Dow · Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Flowers · City of Grand Rapids v. Crocker · Utley v. Taylor & Gaskin, Inc. · Thames v. Mississippi ex rel. Shoemaker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the general rule in subrogation that the subrogee is to be reimbursed only to the extent of the amounts paid in discharge of the obligation assumed by the subrogee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.