Stull v. Ewing

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 16, 1952.

Decided Feb. 5, 1952.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-02-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1968

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Stull v. Ewing

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-02-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard J. Stull, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Holmes Baldridge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Myles J. Lane, U. S. Atty., New York City, Edward H. Hickey, William J. Holloway, Jr., Attorneys, Department of Justice and Leonard B. Zeisler, Attorney, Federal Security Agency, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel, for defendant-appellee.

¶3Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and BRENNAN, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Affirmed on opinion of Rifkind, J., 102 F.Supp. 927.