United States of America v. Noble Cunningham -’s Empirical Analysis
194 F.3d 1186 · 1999
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Baker (2005), United States v. McDowell (2001)
12 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Rasbury v. Internal Revenue Service · Piamba Cortes ex rel. Piamba Cortes v. American Airlines, Inc. · United States v. Zapata
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a defendant ... attempt[ing] to introduce an exculpatory statement made at the time of his arrest without subjecting himself to cross-examination.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“of a pollutant, it has met its burden. According to this interpretation, the guideline assumes actual environmental contamination if the text of § 2Q1.3(b)(1) itself is met. 12 However, Perez insists that an assumption of actual environmental contamination is inappropriate since § 2Q1.3(b)(1)(A) pertains to dumped materials that are not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.