In re Sealed Appellant’s Empirical Analysis
194 F.3d 666 · 1999
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Cpdc Inc Joseph Zer-Ilan (2000), Alberta Energy Partners v. Blast Energy Services, Inc. (2010)
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · State v. Simpson · In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · Theard v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen bad faith is patent from the record and specific findings are unnecessary to understand the misconduct giving rise to the sanction, the necessary finding of 'bad faith' may be inferred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A district court abuses its discretion when its ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n the course of representing a client a lawyer shall not knowingly: (a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Larry Crowe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.