Gavriles v. Verizon Wireless’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2022
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Zahn v. International Paper Co. · Snyder v. Harris · Healy Nh v. Ratta · Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc. · Horton v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Disgorgement is an equitable remedy to force defendant to give up the amount equal to the defendant’s unjust enrichment .... A claim for disgorgement, if successful, results in a pool of money available for the plaintiffs. The proceeds from disgorgement are not directly related to each plaintiffs actual damages and would be distributed to plaintiffs who remained a party to the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.