Kendall v. Curtis’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cothran v. Burk · Thompson v. Ingram · Wright v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where an inconsistent and void verdict is returned by the jury, it is proper for the trial judge to refuse to receive the verdict, and to require them to return for further deliberations, under proper instructions. (Cits.) [Cit.] See OCGA §§ 9-12-4; 9-12-8.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“mold the verdict originally returned by the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.