Talbott v. Talbott’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1966
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Leach v. Leach · Kruse v. Kruse · Hannon v. Hannon · Niccum v. Lawrence · Tompkins v. Garlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“■ “The court shall make provisions for the custody, support and education of the minor children, and may modify or change any order in connection therewith at any time, and shall always have jurisdiction to make any such order to advance the welfare of a minor child if (i) the child is physically present in the county, or (il) domicile of the child is in the state, or (in) the court has previously exercised jurisdiction to determine the custody or care of a child who was at such time domiciled in the state.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wheeler v. Wheeler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.