Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 Kan. 219 - Callan v. Biermann

Callan v. Biermann’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 1992

14 state decisions

401965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Browning v. Lefevre · J. C. Nichols Co. v. Meredith · Curry v. Stewart · Boucher v. Roberts · Cain v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Each party has the absolute right to have his cause argued by counsel before the decision is rendered, whether it is tried to the court or a jury. However, in order to predicate error upon the refusal of the court to allow argument, it must appear that counsel has not waived the right by silence or acquiescence. The record, should affirmatively show that permission to argue was refused,””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.