Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 La. 508 - State v. Frith

State v. Frith’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2006

14 state decisions

1001940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 44 La. Ann. 1014 - State ex rel. Baumann v. Langridge · Ex parte Ryan · Hicks v. Recorder's Court of Detroit

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it shall always be within the discretion of the court, upon the motion either of the district attorney or of the defendant, ... to assign a special day for the trial of any case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.