Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 La. 730 - Townley v. Pomes

Townley v. Pomes’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1974
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1974

6 state decisions

201940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dreher v. Guaranty Bond & Finance Co. · Esmele v. Violet Trapping Co. · Wilkin-Hale State Bank v. Tucker · Favrot v. Chappuis · In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is our opinion that the plaintiff's request for an opportunity to fully present the testimony and complete the record was properly and timely made and that under the circumstances surrounding the trial of the case and in the interest of justice, plaintiff is entitled to this consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.