Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 Md. 288 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
2
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

4 district · 84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently December 2005 · most notably People v. Prosser (1955), Neal v. State (1974)

4 district · 84 state decisions

31019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palko v. State of Connecticut · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Ponzi v. Fessenden · State v. Haas · Pietch v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This appeal may be compared to the sustaining of a demurrer to an indictment, which is a final ruling. The State can appeal, and if the judgment is reversed the case will be remanded for further proceedings.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.