Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 MOAPP 405 - Frazier v. Grob

Frazier v. Grob’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
August 1976
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1976

12 state decisions

401916192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Honselman v. People · State v. Wellman · State v. Katz · State v. Whitmarsh · Cameron v. Cameron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . It was essential to recovery by plaintiff that she prove not only that there was publication made of the offensive words, but that those who heard understood them; that is, understood that defendant meant to charge plaintiff with being guilty of the practice of act charged. The authorities are all one way as to that . . . [Citing eases.] ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.