Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

194 N.C. 582

140 S.E 212

State v. . Briscoe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1927

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1927-11-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1958

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-11-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ClakksoN, J.

¶1 J. D. Baines, deputy sheriff of Gates' County, testified in part: “The defendant bad three bottles of whiskey, one in his hand and two in his pockets. I know whiskey when I smell it.” The defendant at the time was about one hundred yards from his dwelling-house. Testimony to like effect was given by O. W. Hinton, also a deputy sheriff. Defendant testified that he had no whiskey, but what he had was vinegar. One of the counts in the bill of indictment was that defendant did unlawfully “possess intoxicating liquors.” For this he was convicted.

¶2 The defendant in his brief contends: “The court erred in charging as follows: Tt is unlawful for one to have intoxicating liquors in his possession outside of his dwelling-house in any quantity/ instead of charging as follows: 'It is unlawful for one to have intoxicating liquors in his possession outside of his dwelling-house in any quantity for an illegal purpose.’ ”

¶3 The charge as given is now well settled law in this jurisdiction. S. v. Sigmon, 190 N. C., 684; S. v. Pierce, 192 N. C., 766; S. v. Hege, ante, 526.

¶4 The charge of the court below is full, fair, and accurate, and gave defendant every right that he was entitled to under the' law. ¥e can find

¶5 No error.

/194/nc/582 · .json · Public domain