Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 N.C. App. 120 - State v. Smith

194 N.C. App. 120 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crane v. Stern · Nunez v. United States · State v. Jerrett · State v. Scott · State v. Abraham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant's motion to dismiss should be denied if there is substantial evidence: (1) of each essential element of the offense charged and (2) of defendant's being the perpetrator of the offense. Substantial evidence is that amount of relevant evidence necessary to persuade a rational juror to accept a conclusion. On review of a denial of a motion to dismiss, the appellate court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, giving it the benefit of all reasonable inferences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.