Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 194 N.J. 186 - State v. Adams

State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · Holm v. United States · Anderson v. United States · State v. Locurto · State v. Natale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to support the findings[,]'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the witness’ degree of attention, the accuracy of his prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated at the confrontation, and the time between the crime and the confrontation. [ Herrera, supra, 187 N.J. at 503 , 902 A.2d 177 (quoting Manson, supra, 432 U.S. at 114 , 97 S.Ct. at 2253 , 53 L.Ed.2d at 154 ).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`whether the impermissibly suggestive procedure was nevertheless reliable by considering the totality of the circumstances and weighing the suggestive nature of the identification against the reliability of the identification.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.