194 N.J. Super. 451 - State v. Weigel’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2006
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gledhill · State v. Schultz · State v. Longo · State v. Robinson & Chittenden · 75 N.J. Super. 283 - State v. Berko
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We think an intent to prejudice is clearly inferable from the factual situation presented in this case. The legislature has, by the election laws, provided for the office of Commissioner of Registration and has provided that the record of votes cast by citizens in primary elections be kept, an incident of which is a notation of the party ballot voted by each such voter. It is the established public policy that such record be kept and that it be kept honestly and accurately. The altering or falsification of such a record is at least prejudicial to and a fraud upon the State. [ Longo, supra, 132 N.J.L. at 519 , 41 A. 2d 317 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A person is guilty of forgery if, with purpose to defraud or injure anyone, or with knowledge that he is facilitating a fraud or injury to be perpetrated by anyone, the actor: . . . . (2) Makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues or transfers any writing so that it purports to be the act of another who did not authorize that act or of a fictitious person, or to have been executed at a time or place or in a numbered sequence other than was in fact the case, or to be a copy of an original when no such original existed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“A person is guilty of forgery if, with purpose to defraud or injure anyone, or with knowledge that he is facilitating a fraud or injury to be perpetrated by anyone, the actor. ... [ N.J.S.A. 2C:21-1 (emphasis added).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.